BeardlessMarinRider
Member Since: Nov 22, 2007

Info

Products Recommended: none - View Products
Companies Supported: none - View Companies
 

BeardlessMarinRider's Activity

BeardlessMarinRider commented under lettusdude's blog ( May 21, 2009 at 10:44 )
My bad, misread it! Thought it was pretty crazy :)
BeardlessMarinRider commented under lettusdude's blog ( May 21, 2009 at 0:35 )
This seems more than lame to me. Great that's it's a voluntary recall and all that, but I guess they have to otherwise there would be a forced recall anyway with not so great PR. The LAME part is knowing there is a problem and only replacing the frame when a crack has actually started. It is rediculous to limit the drop size to 5ft on bikes like that. If they know there is a manufacturing issue which means the product can not be used as intended then they should replace them all. It isn't acceptable to wait for someone to snap their frame at risk to themselves before the thing actually gets replaced! Irresponsible
BeardlessMarinRider commented under bradwalton's blog ( May 6, 2009 at 7:32 )
It's all about the sack clearance and new school tricks, strength is not a reason. Introducing any curve also introduces stress concentrations so you will be increasing the wall thickness if anything! Don't believe the marketing BS you copied that comment from ;)
BeardlessMarinRider commented under karlheldt's video ( Apr 29, 2009 at 5:36 )
Imagine what he could do on a decent bike ;)

BeardlessMarinRider commented under brule's blog ( Apr 29, 2009 at 5:32 )
Don't be fooled that IS a light frame and is more than on par with the lightest FS frames out there. The build isn't anything especially light though and there's lots of room to drop the weight without losing any ride quality. Perhaps sponser commitments result in the "average" weight...

NoteBoard

No notes :(